History
Thursday, May 17, 2007 at 11:38PM This post is about a thought provoking comment letter that was read out in the local radio news this week.
A listener had written in to compare today's Iraq to pre-independence India in the 1940's!
My intitial reaction was "bah"! After some thought, I realized that the comment was right on!
Both the countries were/are in a state of unrest caused by civil disobedience.
Both countries plagued by attacks on the occupiers (Brits/Americans).
Both countries dealing with separatists within, thanks to divide and rule policies and a furthering of various local interests (in India it was Hindus vs. Muslims and in Iraq it is the different Muslim sects!)
The point that was made based on these similarities was :
1. The British decided India was no longer a place they could occupy!
2. They came up with an EXIT STRATEGY!!!!
3. They got out a few weeks ahead of schedule and Lord Mountbattern just pulled out and handed over control to the Indians.
This resulted in the following :
1. Indians were forced to react!
2. They formed a govenment and learnt to embrace democracy and developed a system realtime.
3. They did go through a painful partition with a lot of bloodshed to appease the separatists.
It took a few decades, but finally, they got their act together and are a major player in the modern world!!
So, an exit strategy today might not be a bad idea after all!
Who knows, history might do the one thing she is best at doing.
Repeat herself !?
.
Reader Comments (1)
I think that is a valid observation. And quite a thought provoking one at that. The only element that i would like to point out, is the changes that have taken place in the world since then.
Communications - internet and others.., fanaticsm, intolerance, weapons et al. These were not things that young India had to deal with. That changes the ball game quie a bit !